<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obots.org 2.0 &#187; Judge Land</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obots.org/archives/tag/judge-land/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obots.org</link>
	<description>Birthers need not apply</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Taitz hit with THIRD CA Bar complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.obots.org/archives/172</link>
		<comments>http://www.obots.org/archives/172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obot1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smack Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay D. Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obot Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhodes v MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obots.org/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christmas came early this year for the Obots. In a 43-page order, Judge Land in Georgia raked birther lawyer Orly Taitz over the coals. But not only did he excoriate her and sanction her, he included the following cherry on top of the Obot ice cream sundae: The Court further directs the Clerk of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_177" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 220px"><a href="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/gadistrictcourt.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-177 " title="gadistrictcourt" src="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/gadistrictcourt.jpg" alt="GA Federal Court" width="210" height="155" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">GA Federal Court</p></div>
<p>Christmas came early this year for the Obots. In a 43-page order, Judge Land in Georgia raked birther lawyer Orly Taitz over the coals. But not only did he excoriate her and sanction her, he included the following cherry on top of the Obot ice cream sundae:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Court further directs the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this Order to the State Bar of California, 180 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, for whatever use it deems appropriate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Court to California Bar: You have a problem. Deal with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obots.org/archives/172/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge spanks naughty lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.obots.org/archives/167</link>
		<comments>http://www.obots.org/archives/167#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obot1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhodes v MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obots.org/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear, poor little Orly. The big bad old judge has sanctioned you to the tune of $20,000. But think of it as a learning experience. You really have to learn some respect for the legal profession that you are trying to be a part of. Read federal Judge Land&#8217;s scathing order here. The judge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_169" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 234px"><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/birther_orly_taitz_responds_to_judges_20k_fine_sho.php?ref=fpb"><img class="size-full wp-image-169 " title="20091007_alc_a01_198.jpg" src="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/orlydoorway.jpg" alt="Unrepentant Orly Taitz" width="224" height="168" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Unrepentant Orly Taitz</p></div>
<p>Oh dear, poor little Orly. The big bad old judge has sanctioned you to the tune of $20,000. But think of it as a learning experience. You really have to learn some respect for the legal profession that you are <em>trying</em> to be a part of.</p>
<p>Read federal Judge Land&#8217;s scathing order <a href="http://tiny.cc/SANCTIONS">here</a>. The judge called your contentions &#8220;laughable&#8221;, your claims &#8220;frivolous&#8221; and your allegations &#8220;fictitious&#8221;!</p>
<p>You have 30 days to pay up the $20,000. Better get filling those teeth because I don&#8217;t think you have any future in the legal field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obots.org/archives/167/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birthers think all blacks look alike</title>
		<link>http://www.obots.org/archives/93</link>
		<comments>http://www.obots.org/archives/93#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obot1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors and smears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay D. Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current Attorney General of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D. Douglas   What]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamar Rozier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert D. Douglas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephan Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obots.org/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a remarkable legal brief, Attorney Taitz, included this affidavit: BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, Lamar Rozier on this 26th day of September, 2009, personally appeared Robert D. Douglas, known to me to be a credible person and of lawful age, who being by me first duly sown on his oath deposes and says: On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_95" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 121px"><a href="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ericholder.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-95 " title="ericholder" src="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ericholder.jpg" alt="AG Holder" width="111" height="118" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Eric Holder</p></div>
<p>In a remarkable legal brief, Attorney Taitz, included this affidavit:</p>
<blockquote><p>BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, Lamar Rozier<br />
on this 26th day of September, 2009, personally appeared Robert D. Douglas, known to me to be a credible person and of lawful age, who being by me first duly sown on his oath deposes and says:</p>
<p>On the day of he hearing for Major Stephan Cook before Federal Judge Clay D. Land, Columbus, Ga., my wife, my wifeâ€™s sister, her husband and I had entered the little coffee shop directly across from the Court House while waiting for the doors to open to the public. I was sitting in the small seating area, set aside for their customers, while facing and looking directly at the entrance to the shop. All persons entering had to pass withing 8-10 feet from where I was sitting.</p>
<div id="attachment_132" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 134px"><a href="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/jessejackson.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-132" title="jessejackson" src="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/jessejackson.jpg" alt="NOT Eric Holder" width="124" height="124" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">NOT Eric Holder</p></div>
<p>I looked up and immediately recognized an individual entering and approaching the serving counter, due to his well known TV displayed distinguishing features: his trim upper lip mustache, not large of stature and general olive complexion. I knew instantly it was non[e] other than Eric Holder, the current Attorney General of the United States. I called this to the attention of those present and all agreed it appeared to be who I readily recognized. He entered unguarded, no accompanying entourage and probably thought he would not be recognized.</p>
<div id="attachment_125" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 107px"><a href="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/alsharpton.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-125 " title="alsharpton" src="http://www.obots.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/alsharpton.jpg" alt="Not Eric Holder" width="97" height="125" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Not Eric Holder either</p></div>
<p>Red flags went up immediately in my mind and the questions remain, as yet. Why does the Attorney General of the United States need to be present in an obscure hearing well of his beaten path? Could it possible be, since Holder did not present himself in open court, he may have had a little â€œwhisper in the earâ€ to a Federal Judge in order to bias his judicial vision and adhere to the Presidentâ€™s agenda of obstruction?</p>
<p>Only Judge Clay D. Land can answer those question.</p>
<p>Robert D. Douglas</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s the problem? The hearing in question was in Georgia on July 16th. <a href="http://www.obots.org/wp-admin/post-new.php">Holder was in California</a> on that day. I guess to birthers all blacks look alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obots.org/archives/93/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orly lies in court&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.obots.org/archives/75</link>
		<comments>http://www.obots.org/archives/75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obot1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett v. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commander in Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connie Rhodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insufferable dialect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and Commander in Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhodes v MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undersigned counsel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obots.org/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;and I don&#8217;t mean that she took a nap. Y&#8217;all know that miz Orly has two o&#8217;dem law suits a&#8217;goin&#8217; on. But she done file thangs in one dat don&#8217; say whut it say in de udder. I give a big ole thank&#8217;e to PolitiJab.com wh&#8217;r I done stole dis. In dis&#8217;un she be a&#8217;arguin&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and I don&#8217;t mean that she took a nap.</p>
<p>Y&#8217;all know that miz Orly has two o&#8217;dem law suits a&#8217;goin&#8217; on. But she done file thangs in one dat don&#8217; say whut it say in de udder. I give a big ole thank&#8217;e to PolitiJab.com wh&#8217;r I done stole dis.</p>
<p>In dis&#8217;un she be a&#8217;arguin&#8217; dat the judge gib her standin&#8217; and in de udder she say he didn&#8217;. Land o&#8217; mercy. A Christian woman aughtn&#8217;t a&#8217;lie like dat.</p>
<table style="text-align: left; width: 100%;" border="1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://ia301521.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591.75.0.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Motion for Leave to file a Surreply</span></span></a>, filed in <span style="font-style: italic;">Barnett v. Obama </span>on September 26, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://ia311029.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.24.0.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Motion for Recusal</span></span></a>, filed in <span style="font-style: italic;">Rhodes v. MacDonald </span>on October 2, 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>It is true that Judge Land ruled in favor of defense in a case seeking stay of deployment of active duty military pending verification of Mr. Obama&#8217;s legitimacy for the position of the President and Commander in Chief. <span style="font-weight: bold;">What is most important in that case</span>, is that for the first time after over a 100 legal actions filed all over the Nation challenging Mr. Obama&#8217;s legitimacy for presidency, <span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">a judge in this case found standing, as judge Land got straight to the substance of the Plaintiffsâ€™ case, assuming standing</span></span> of the members of the military to challenge the legitimacy of the Commander in Chief, but deciding to exercise discretionary abstention on the issue of deployment. Most of the plaintiffs in this case before His Honor, judge Carter, are members of the military, and as such, <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">based on the precedent set in Rhodes case, they have standing to challenge legitimacy of Mr. Obama</span></span>, therefore contradicting the defendants&#8217; main argument in the motion to dismiss, their claim that none of the plaintiffs have standing. The fact that Judge Land decided to abstain on the issue of deployment is irrelevant in this case, as it goes to the final disposition of the case, and whether the judiciary should abstain from reviewing a certain procedure within the military. (Motion to file Surreply at page 2.)</td>
<td style="vertical-align: top;">It is clear and obvious from <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Judge Landâ€™s determination of Plaintiff Connie Rhodesâ€™ lack of standing </span></span>(and the undersigned counselâ€™s â€œnegligenceâ€ or â€œcontemptuous disregardâ€ of the courtâ€™s orders in failing to stand down when ordered to do so ) in and from the fact that Judge Land clearly and plainly did not read the Plaintiffâ€™s Complaint or Application for TRO, and from the rapidity of his decision to deny Plaintiff his Seventh Amendment right to a trial-by-jury without first evaluating the sufficiency of 85%-90% of the issues in Plaintiffâ€™s complaint. (Recusal Motion at page 12.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Judge LAND has also completely failed to </span></span>evaluate or even pretend to have read enough of Plaintiff Rhodesâ€™s Application for TRO and Complaint<span style="color: #ff0000;"> <span style="font-weight: bold;">to determine whether or not Plaintiff Rhodes has standing</span></span>, for example, to demand a declaratory judgment regarding the procedures by &#8230;.(Recusal Motion at page 15.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>&#8230;Plaintiff submits that Judge LANDâ€™s manner of precipitous, hasting, unreflective rulings within mere hours of filing, and <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">his rulings on one particular issue, that of the Plaintiffâ€™s lack of STANDING </span></span>(without addressing any of the actual text of the Plaintiffâ€™s complaint, and in fact, obviously misunderstanding it) produces a result so bizarre as to flunk the â€œreasonable juristâ€ standard, and therefore constitutes grounds for recusal under 28 U.S.C.Â§455(a) on the grounds of appearance of impropriety, unwillingness to decide a case fairly in regard to this particular issue, litigant, or perhaps even Plaintiffâ€™s attorney. (Recusal Motion at page 16.)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<table style="text-align: left; width: 100%;" border="1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://ia301521.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591.75.0.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Motion for Leave to file a Surreply</span></span></a>, filed in <span style="font-style: italic;">Barnett v. Obama </span>on September 26, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://ia311029.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.24.0.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Motion for Recusal</span></span></a>, filed in <span style="font-style: italic;">Rhodes v. MacDonald </span>on October 2, 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>It is true that Judge Land ruled in favor of defense in a case seeking stay of deployment of active duty military pending verification of Mr. Obama&#8217;s legitimacy for the position of the President and Commander in Chief. <span style="font-weight: bold;">What is most important in that case</span>, is that for the first time after over a 100 legal actions filed all over the Nation challenging Mr. Obama&#8217;s legitimacy for presidency, <span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">a judge in this case found standing, as judge Land got straight to the substance of the Plaintiffsâ€™ case, assuming standing</span></span>of the members of the military to challenge the legitimacy of the Commander in Chief, but deciding to exercise discretionary abstention on the issue of deployment. Most of the plaintiffs in this case before His Honor, judge Carter, are members of the military, and as such, <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">based on the precedent set in Rhodes case, they have standing to challenge legitimacy of Mr. Obama</span></span>, therefore contradicting the defendants&#8217; main argument in the motion to dismiss, their claim that none of the plaintiffs have standing. The fact that Judge Land decided to abstain on the issue of deployment is irrelevant in this case, as it goes to the final disposition of the case, and whether the judiciary should abstain from reviewing a certain procedure within the military. (Motion to file Surreply at page 2.)</td>
<td>It is clear and obvious from <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Judge Landâ€™s determination of Plaintiff Connie Rhodesâ€™ lack of standing</span></span>(and the undersigned counselâ€™s â€œnegligenceâ€ or â€œcontemptuous disregardâ€ of the courtâ€™s orders in failing to stand down when ordered to do so ) in and from the fact that Judge Land clearly and plainly did not read the Plaintiffâ€™s Complaint or Application for TRO, and from the rapidity of his decision to deny Plaintiff his Seventh Amendment right to a trial-by-jury without first evaluating the sufficiency of 85%-90% of the issues in Plaintiffâ€™s complaint. (Recusal Motion at page 12.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Judge LAND has also completely failed to </span></span>evaluate or even pretend to have read enough of Plaintiff Rhodesâ€™s Application for TRO and Complaint<span style="color: #ff0000;"> <span style="font-weight: bold;">to determine whether or not Plaintiff Rhodes has standing</span></span>, for example, to demand a declaratory judgment regarding the procedures by &#8230;.(Recusal Motion at page 15.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>&#8230;Plaintiff submits that Judge LANDâ€™s manner of precipitous, hasting, unreflective rulings within mere hours of filing, and <span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">his rulings on one particular issue, that of the Plaintiffâ€™s lack of STANDING </span></span>(without addressing any of the actual text of the Plaintiffâ€™s complaint, and in fact, obviously misunderstanding it) produces a result so bizarre as to flunk the â€œreasonable juristâ€ standard, and therefore constitutes grounds for recusal under 28 U.S.C.Â§455(a) on the grounds of appearance of impropriety, unwillingness to decide a case fairly in regard to this particular issue, litigant, or perhaps even Plaintiffâ€™s attorney. (Recusal Motion at page 16.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obots.org/archives/75/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orly headed for FEMA gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.obots.org/archives/39</link>
		<comments>http://www.obots.org/archives/39#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obot1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FEMA Gulag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birther lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Emergency Management Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obots.org/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the mind of Orly Taitz, birther lawyer, the world is a very different place from the one inhabited by normal people. Not only is President Obama an illegal alien, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is preparing a string of &#8220;concentration camps&#8221; to incarcerate all the real &#8220;patriotic Americans&#8221; (i.e., those who share her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the mind of Orly Taitz, birther lawyer, the world is a very different place from the one inhabited by normal people. Not only is President Obama an illegal alien, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is preparing a string of &#8220;concentration camps&#8221; to incarcerate all the real &#8220;patriotic Americans&#8221; (i.e., those who share her delusions).</p>
<p>When Judge Land in Georgia pointed out for the world that Orly Taitz had brought a lawsuit with no legal merit for the purposes of publicity, and threatened a $10,000 fine, <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/21/taitz_rhodes/">Orly struck back</a> calling the judge a &#8220;traitor&#8221; and saying she was about to be sent to the &#8220;<a href="http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/fema.htm">FEMA Gulag</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>I hope they don&#8217;t have Internet access in the FEMA Gulag. I for one will be glad to be rid of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obots.org/archives/39/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

