Home > Orly Taitz > How to choose a dentist

How to choose a dentist

September 19th, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

Would you go to a dentist who had never filled a tooth before? How about a dentist that was supposed to pull one tooth, but decided on their own, and without asking you, to pull out another one?

That’s a good comparison to Orly Taitz, DDS, Esq.

Under questioning by Texas judge Burt Carnes (Brockhausen v. Andrade) Orly Taitz admitted that she has never tried a case. Then in Georgia, after sanctions were threatened, Orly filed a motion to reconsider without considering the risk she was putting her client in!

Here’s what Orly’s client, Connie Rhodes, said:

Please withdraw the motion to stay that Ms. Taitz filed this past Thursday. I did not authorize it and I do not wish to proceed. Ms. Taitz never requested my permission nor did I give it. I would not have been aware of this if I had not seen it on the late news Thursday before going to board my plane to Iraq…

Furthermore, I do not wish for Ms. Taitz to file any future motions or represent me in any way in this court. It is my plan to file a complaint with the California State Bar due to her reprehensible and unprofessional actions.

While she has never tried a case, she certainly has lots of experience having them dismissed.

  1. Sterngard
    September 20th, 2009 at 12:43 | #1

    You mean Connie Rhodes, not Pamela Gates. Gates is in a different case. And it’s actually Pamela Barnes. “Gates” is SecDef.

  2. realist
    September 20th, 2009 at 12:47 | #2

    Just FYI, it was Judge Carnes in Georgetown, TX, a state judge who questioned Orly regarding her trial court experience. She never appeared in front of Federal Court Judge Rodriguez in TX. You can view the transcript from the Brockhausen transcript here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/18284002/BROCKHAUSEN-v-ANDRADE-Transcript-of-Proceedings-Pleas-to-Jurisdiction-Hearing-12209

    Also Orly’s client’s name in the GA case is Capt. Connie Rhodes where the letter was written to Federal Judge Land, not Pamela Gates. The “Pamela” in the California case is Pamela Barnett, not Gates.

    • obot1
      September 20th, 2009 at 12:53 | #3

      Robble, robble. Don’t confuse me with facts.